Will any OpenAI GPT model score at least 60% on the FrontierMath Exam?

Market participants currently imply a 20.0% probability for "Will any OpenAI GPT model score at least 60% on the FrontierMath Exam?".

The YES side is priced at 20.0¢, and the NO side at 76.0¢.

Liquidity is low, supported by $1,557 in recent trading activity.

Resolution Criteria

This market will resolve to "Yes" if any OpenAI GPT model achieves the listed score or greater on the FrontierMath Exam by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No".

This market will resolve according to the Epoch AI’s Frontier Math benchmarking leaderboard (https://epoch.ai/frontiermath) for Tier 1-3. Studies which are not included in the leaderboard (e.g. https://x.com/EpochAIResearch/status/1945905796904005720) will not be considered.

The primary resolution source will be information from EpochAI; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.

Market Interpretation

Prediction markets function as real-time consensus engines.

Traders continuously buy and sell outcome shares based on:

• breaking news
• macro developments
• public narratives
• institutional positioning
• probability reassessments

As a result, market pricing reflects aggregate trader expectations rather than static forecasts or polling systems.

At the current pricing structure:

• YES trades near 20.0¢
• NO trades near 76.0¢
• Implied probability sits near 20.0%

These probabilities may shift rapidly as new information enters the market.

Liquidity & Conviction Analysis

As of May 8, 2026 at 11:24 AM, liquidity conditions act as a primary structural filter on prediction market signal quality.

Medium liquidity conviction suggests moderate participation depth, where price discovery is active but not fully saturated by institutional or high-frequency flow.

Higher liquidity environments typically produce:

• tighter spreads
• faster price discovery
• stronger informational efficiency
• lower pricing instability

Lower liquidity environments tend to exhibit:

• wider spreads
• delayed consensus formation
• increased volatility from isolated trades
• weaker signal reliability in short time windows

Overall, liquidity acts as a direct proxy for how “stable” the implied probability surface is at any given moment.

Why This Signal Exists in Prediction Markets

Prediction markets function as continuous consensus engines where probability is not stated — it is priced.

Each trade updates a live belief distribution, turning scattered human judgment into a single evolving likelihood curve.

Compared to static polling or narrative reporting, this structure adapts instantly to:

• regime shifts in geopolitics
• macroeconomic shocks and policy changes
• institutional order flow and positioning
• narrative acceleration or decay
• liquidity-driven sentiment swings
• information asymmetry correction

In practice, these markets behave less like betting tools and more like real-time probabilistic sensors for world events.

They compress collective intelligence into a dynamic signal that updates with every transaction.

Market Structure Transition

As of May 8, 2026 at 11:24 AM, prediction markets have evolved into persistent global probability infrastructure.

Polymarket and Kalshi now operate as high-throughput probability engines, with cumulative volumes exceeding $150B+ and sustained monthly flow above $7B.

Market activity has shifted from episodic speculation toward continuous liquidity formation, where geopolitical events, macroeconomic narratives, elections, AI milestones, and financial expectations are constantly repriced in real time.

This transformation has turned prediction markets into always-on consensus surfaces capable of reflecting crowd intelligence faster than traditional media, polling systems, or institutional forecasting pipelines.